51378
Accession Number
39189
Editor
Madden. Odile; Charola, A. Elena; Cullen Cobb, Kim; DePriest, Paula T.; Koestler, Robert J.
Title Of Article Chaper
Separating Good Plastic from Bad Plastic in Conservation Biology
Title Of Journal Book
The Age of Plastic: Ingenuity and Responsibility: Proceedings of the 2012 MCI Symposium
Volume
7
Pages
77-83
Collation
7 p. : ills.
Reference Bibliography
Includes bibliographic references
Publisher
Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Pres
Publisher City
Washington, DC
ISSN
1949-2367 (online); 1949-2359 (print)
Language Of Text
English
Language Of Summary
English
Literature Type
Monograph
Literature Level
Analytic
Abstract
Conservation biology aims at understanding and maintaining the biological diversity
that is critical for the sustainability of entire ecosystems while benefiting human societies. Plastic materials have brought many improvements in human daily life but also have many positive or negative
impacts on conservation efforts. They include obvious detrimental effects on the environment (plastic
pollution of lands and seas) as well as positive or even irreplaceable roles in animal care and biological research. Specifically, plastic enables us to save species from extinction by providing tools (including medical and laboratory supplies) and allowing technologies (assisted reproduction or genomic
studies) that would be impossible to implement otherwise. Conversely, the presence of plastic waste
in the environment threatens wildlife species that eat or become entangled by debris. In addition,
plastic polymers are leaching out chemicals (mostly plasticizers) that can be transferred to wildlife
and humans through simple contact or by ingestion. With controversial and sometimes contradictory
reports on issues related to plastic, the difference between good plastic and bad plastic in conservation
biology still needs to be thoroughly explored. The objective of this paper is twofold: first, to review
the current interactions of plastic with natural habitats and animal populations either in the wild or
in captive conditions and, second, to propose the design of systematic studies and wildlife monitoring
to better identify and then mitigate the most significant, detrimental effects of plastic.
that is critical for the sustainability of entire ecosystems while benefiting human societies. Plastic materials have brought many improvements in human daily life but also have many positive or negative
impacts on conservation efforts. They include obvious detrimental effects on the environment (plastic
pollution of lands and seas) as well as positive or even irreplaceable roles in animal care and biological research. Specifically, plastic enables us to save species from extinction by providing tools (including medical and laboratory supplies) and allowing technologies (assisted reproduction or genomic
studies) that would be impossible to implement otherwise. Conversely, the presence of plastic waste
in the environment threatens wildlife species that eat or become entangled by debris. In addition,
plastic polymers are leaching out chemicals (mostly plasticizers) that can be transferred to wildlife
and humans through simple contact or by ingestion. With controversial and sometimes contradictory
reports on issues related to plastic, the difference between good plastic and bad plastic in conservation
biology still needs to be thoroughly explored. The objective of this paper is twofold: first, to review
the current interactions of plastic with natural habitats and animal populations either in the wild or
in captive conditions and, second, to propose the design of systematic studies and wildlife monitoring
to better identify and then mitigate the most significant, detrimental effects of plastic.
Keywords
plastic;conservation;biology
pub_id
51378