45897
Title Of Article Chaper
Structural treatments for canvas paintings in 2002: summary of questionnaire replies
Title Of Journal Book
ICOM Committee for Conservation, ICOM-CC : 13th Triennial Meeting, Rio de Janeiro, 22-27 September 2002 : preprints
Volume
1
Pages
321-327
Collation
7 p. : ills.
Reference Bibliography
Includes bibliographic references
Publisher
ICOM-CC; James & James
Publisher City
London
ISBN
1-902916-30-1
Language Of Text
English
Literature Type
Monograph
Literature Level
Analytic
Abstract
A summary is given of 165 replies to a questionnaire and results are compared to two previously published surveys (Rees Jones et al. 1975, Hedley and Villers 1984). Lining with BEVA 371 gel or film is the most commonly used lining adhesive and linen the most popular lining fabric. Lining with acrylic adhesives is more widespread – a development corresponding to overall increases in lining pressures but decreases in temperatures. The use of airflow tables has risen since 1984, facilitating a wider range of treatments. Humidity chambers for flattening treatments are also more commonly employed. Most favour natural consolidants but prefer synthetic adhesives for tear repair. The trend towards less interventive treatments, noted in 1984, is now more widespread. Although the majority believe lining is still valid, most avoid this when possible and generally lining activity has declined. Nowadays, the prime reason for lining is to strengthen a weakened original support. Past concerns, such as improving surface appearance and prolonging the painting’s life expectancy now have less currency in the consideration of lining treatments. -- SCMRE
Keywords
structure; treatment; canvas; lining; conservation; minimal -- SCMRE
pub_id
45897