6250
Accession Number
31156
Author
Zhao, Gui-fang; Sun, Yan-zhong; Ma, Qing-yu; Liu, Xiu-ying; Chng (Chen), Yun-shi
Author Affiliation
China National Cultural Property; China National Property; China National Property; Science Academy of China Forestry, The Wood Institute; Science Academy of China Forestry, The Wood Institute
Title Of Article Chaper
Preservatives: loss-resistance and mould prevention
Title Of Journal Book
Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
44199
Collation
3 p. : ills.
Reference Bibliography
Includes bibliographic references
ISSN
1005-1538
Language Of Text
Chinese
Language Of Summary
Chinese; English
Literature Type
Serial
Literature Level
Analytic
Abstract
In selecting preservatives for wooden artifacts, tests were conducted on four preservatives; ML-208, MV+OP-10, prochloraz and tebuconazole. The results showed that each had different loss-resistance. ML-208 had the best result Prochloraz was better than Tebuconazole and MV+OP-10 was the worst. While the loss-resistance of MV+OP-10 was poor, it retained high antiseptic ability after scouring by rainwater. Loss-resistance of ML-208 was strong but its prevention of mould was poor.
Keywords
preservative; prochloraz; tebuconazole; loss; resistance
pub_id
6250