1527
Accession Number
28767
Editor
Bridgland, Janet
Title Of Article Chaper
Relative humidity: a discussion of correct/incorrect values
Title Of Journal Book
ICOM Committee for Conservation tenth triennial meeting, Washington, DC, 22-27 August 1993: preprints
Volume
2
Pages
624-629
Collation
ill.
Reference Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references
Publisher
International Council of Museums Committee for Conservation
Publisher City
Paris
ISBN
0-935868-65-8
Language Of Text
English
Language Of Summary
English
Literature Type
Monograph
Literature Level
Analytic
Meeting
ICOM Committee for Conservation 10th Triennial Meeting
Meeting City
Washington, DC
Abstract
Relative humidity specifications for museums became very stringent during the 1960s and 1970s, without detailed explanation. The Canadian Conservation Institute has reviewed the relevant data in order to answer common cost/benefit questions, not just stipulate correct RH. Mechanical, biological, and chemical deterioration all rise sharply beyond 75per thousand RH, and increase significantly for every increment to 100per thousand RH. Fracture in rigid, constrained organic artifacts, given a relaxed state at some middle RH, becomes probable in one cycle only for a drop of -25per thousand to -50per thousand RH. Fatigue models imply that each reduction of fluctuations to one half of this critical value will reduce deterioration per cycle to 0.01per thousand- 0. 00001per thousand. Many flexible or sliding assemblies are immune since constraint is missing. -- CAL
Keywords
RH;relative;humidity;museum;environment;standard;specifica tion -- CAL
pub_id
1527
Meeting Date
19930822-19930827